Prediction of Marjorie Macfarlane vs Geraldine Beamish Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Macfarlane vs G. Beamish

Marjorie Macfarlane

NZL

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

140

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Geraldine Beamish

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

140

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Macfarlane 1 - 1 Beamish

They have played 5 sets in total, with Marjorie Macfarlane winning 2 and Geraldine Beamish winning 3. The last match between Marjorie Macfarlane and Geraldine Beamish was at the Scarborough 2, 15-08-1927, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Macfarlane getting the victory 10-8 3-6 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Macfarlane	1
Beamish	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Scarborough 2(08-15-27)

Stats

Marjorie Macfarlane

Geraldine Beamish

(SF) Blackheath(07-25-27)

Stats

Geraldine Beamish

Marjorie Macfarlane

M. Macfarlane vs G. Beamish H2H Profile

M. Macfarlane	Stats	G. Beamish
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
60.71% (51-33)	Career Total W/L	77.85% (608-173)
1	Grass	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Macfarlane vs G. Beamish Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marjorie Macfarlane has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Geraldine Beamish has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marjorie Macfarlane, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Geraldine Beamish has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Marjorie Macfarlane has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geraldine Beamish has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Marjorie Macfarlane has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Geraldine Beamish winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Marjorie Macfarlane has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 78% (W/L 18/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 8/8). Geraldine Beamish has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 78% (W/L 87/14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 218/67).
Player level: In the last year, Marjorie Macfarlane has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Geraldine Beamish has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marjorie Macfarlane winning 1 times and Geraldine Beamish being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Marjorie Macfarlane winning 2 and Geraldine Beamish winning 3.
The last match between Marjorie Macfarlane and Geraldine Beamish was at the Scarborough 2, 15-08-1927, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Marjorie Macfarlane getting the victory 10-8 3-6 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marjorie Macfarlane has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Geraldine Beamish has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marjorie Macfarlane has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geraldine Beamish has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Marjorie Macfarlane has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geraldine Beamish has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Marjorie Macfarlane vs Geraldine Beamish Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Macfarlane vs G. Beamish H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Macfarlane	Stats	G. Beamish
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
26	Games Won	31
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Macfarlane Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 20-06-1938
R1 Madzy Rollin CouquerqueM. Rollin	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Auckland - 23-01-1935
F Dulcie NichollsD. Nicholls	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 10-12-1934
R3 Gwen StevensonG. Stevenson	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Evelyn DearmanE. Dearman	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Sylvia LanceS. Lance	W	8-6 3-6 6-4	Stats

View All

G. Beamish Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Queens Club Indoors - 16-10-1933
R3 Ermyntrude HarveyE. Harvey	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Felixstowe East England - 01-08-1933
F Lucy BondL. Bond	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
London Indoors - 10-10-1932
R3 Peggy Scriven VivianP. Scriven	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Cirencester - 12-09-1932
F Phyllis WhitleyP. Whitley	W	8-6 6-3	Stats
East Grinstead - 18-07-1932
F Elizabeth MacreadyE. Macready	L	4-6 6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Macfarlane vs G. Beamish Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Macfarlane	Stats	G. Beamish
60.71% (51/33)	YTD Win/Loss	77.85% (608/173)
55.74% (102/81)	Sets Win/Loss	76.83% (1240/374)
52.30% (922/841)	Games Win/Loss	65.89% (8782/4546)
50.00% (8/8)	Clay Win/Loss	76.49% (218/67)
57.14% (4/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	75.93% (41/13)
55.26% (21/17)	Grass Win/Loss	76.83% (262/79)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.00% (0/3)	Slam W/L	62.86% (22/13)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
59% (47/79)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	78% (587/749)
68% (17/25)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (50/113)
89% (46/41)	1st Set Won, Won Match	94% (597/564)
11% (46/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	6% (597/33)
18% (33/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (155/26)